Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 1922No. A-3776PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.

H. L. Bennett, plaintiff in error, in this opinion referred to as the defendant, was by information filed in the district court of Lincoln county, November 29, 1919, charged as follows:

“That H. L. Bennett* * * did then and there willfully, unlawfully, knowingly, and feloniously, and with the intent to cheat and defraud one H. E. Inman by means of a false instrument in writing, to wit, a check, which check is in words and figures as follows, to-wit: ‘Depew, Okla., May 2, 1919. The First State Bank. Pay to H. E. Inman, or order, $15.00, fifteen and no/100 dollars. H. L. Bennett' — offer and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Williams v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bowes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Westmoreland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
  2. One Chicago Coin's Play Boy Marble Board, No. 19771 v. State ex rel. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Beach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Huckaby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API