Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Berens

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFeitz, J.

In so far as pertinent here it suffices to note the following facts which are alleged in the complaint and have not been denied by the defendants, Berens, Ditter, and Leavitt and wife, upon whose motion the court entered the order dismissing the action which is under review on this appeal. Since January 24, 1941, plaintiff, C. G. Cannon, has been the guardian of the person and estate of Mary Welter, an insane incompetent; and as such guardian he has been duly authorized by an order of the county court of Outagamie county to commence and prosecute this action. That court in June, 1928,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. DrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Gleixner v. SchulkewitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thorp Sales Corp. v. LeaseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API