Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Dunbar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Skelos, J.E

The office of the Queens County District Attorney (hereinafter the District Attorney’s office) instituted a program (hereinafter the Program) under which arrested individuals are systematically interviewed just prior to arraignment, or, in other words, immediately before those individuals’ indelible right to counsel would attach. As part of the Program, the District Attorney’s office formulated a script, containing a number of statements, which is read to suspects before they are advised of their constitutional rights as required under Miranda v Arizona (384 US…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API