Legal Opinion
United States v. 1982 Sanger 24' Spectra Boat
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 1984No. Nos. 83-1810 to 83-1812PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
The claimants’ motions for rehearing in these three cases are granted. The memorandum disposition filed on December 23, 1983 is vacated. Pursuant to that disposition this panel sua sponte determined that it lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. The panel was in error. We now determine that this court does have jurisdiction and that the district court committed reversible error in dismissing the claims as it did.
FACTS
On February 17, 1983 the United States filed complaints for forfeiture against (1) a 1982 Sanger 24-foot Spectra boat, (2) a 1980 Lincoln Continental, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Murray W. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Cross-Appellants, and Sam Steiger, Deponent, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Dredge Corp. v. PennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Laura Wilson v. Moore and Associates, Inc., Dba Uni-Check, Fdba Telecheck Hawaii, a Hawaii CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Jenkins v. Whittaker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.