Legal Opinion

Phoenix State Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The principal question at issue upon this reservation, arising out of certain provisions in the will of Ruth Katharine Gaylord, is whether her aunt is by implication given a life use of the residue of the estate. The particular portions of the will involved are these: “FIFTH. If my mother, Katharine Arms Gaylord, should survive me, I give, devise and bequeath to my said mother all the residue of my property of whatever kind, and wherever it may be situated, to have the use and income thereof during her natural life. SIXTH. If my mother should not survive me, I give, devise and bequeath all of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brown v. . QuintardNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Bond v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McDonald v. Hartford Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. McFarland v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Connecticut Superior Court · 1973
  3. Allen v. TysonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Barrett v. Air Reduction Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API