Legal Opinion

Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Coffin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1890PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Bile in equity, brought by the trustee under the will of Jared Coffin as tbe successor of the trustees named therein, for instructions as to the disposition of one seventh of the estate. Holmes, J., reserved the case, at the request of all the parties, for the consideration of the full court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

The whole of the testator’s estate was devised and bequeathed to three trustees, Israel Whitney, Thaddeus Nichols, and Henry A. Kelly, for the various purposes which appear in the successive clauses of his will. The estate was to be divided into seven equal parts, each of which was to be held as a separate and distinct fund. Of the seven shares, the interest, income, etc. of five of them were bequeathed respectively to his five children then living, for their natural lives, and at their deaths to be divided among their children or the issue of such children. If either of them died and left no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. First Parish in FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Baxter v. BaxterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Eustace v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Fitts v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Sanger v. BourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Polsey v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Jones v. GaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API