Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1915No. 799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

The appellee, V. T. Hancock, as the assignee of S. E. McLellan, sued J. R. Overstreet and R. J. Doveless. The petition alleges that in March, 1910, Mc-Lellan entered into an agreement with Over-street and Loveless, by the terms of which McLellan was to have the exclusive right to sell the Detroiter automobile in Limestone county, Tex., and along the edge of Hill county, from March 12, 1913, until October 1, 1913, and during that time McLellan was to receive 18 per cent, commission on all automobiles sold in that territory. It was stipulated that McLellan was to deposit with appellants $250,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Milburn Manufacturing Co. v. PeakTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Thompson-Houston Electric Co. v. BergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Harrell v. ZimplemanTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Mills v. JohnstonTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Barnes Safe & Lock Co. v. Bloch Bros. Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. City of San Antonio v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API