City of San Antonio v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentBickett, Chief Justice
■ I dissent from the majority decision for the reasons hereinafter fully shown.
Chas. M. Stieff, Inc., a corporation, sued the. city of San Antonio to recover the price of a piano, which was sold and .delivered to the city, or, in the alternative, to recover the possession of the piano and the amount of its reasonable rental value. Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for $1,595, representing the purchase price of the piano, $1,300, plus interest. Defendant has appealed from that judgment.
The important issues on this appeal are: (1) Whether, as between Chas. M. Stieff, Inc., and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Warner v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.