Legal Opinion

In Re Centeno

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 2010No. 1801 EDA 2009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Commonwealth appeals from the decision of the trial court to issue to appel-lee, Marcel Centeno, a license under The Private Detective Act of 1953, 22 P.S. §§ 11 et seq. 1 We reverse.

Since the germane facts are not in dispute, we will adopt, for purposes of considering this appeal, the following summary of the facts set forth in the brief of appel-lee:

Marcel Centeno, a resident of Berks County, Pennsylvania applied for a private detective license pursuant to the Private Detective Act of 1953, 22 P.S. §§ [11] et seq. Currently, he is employed as a correctional officer at the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanley AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. GreggSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. In re Kuma K-9 Security, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. In Re Millennium Consulting & Associates for a Private Detective LicenseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. NaussSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re: Application of John CladerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. In Re: Application of John CladerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. In Re: Application of John CladerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. In Re: Application of John CladerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. In Re: Application of John CladerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API