Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re: Application of John Clader

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2016No. 2094 EDA 2014Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

OTT, J.:

While the Majority points out the public policy considerations at issue when law enforcement officers seek a private detective license, I believe that, for purposes of a private detective liéense, a school police officer’s position does not equate with other law enforcement positions.' Furthermore, I view the court’s limitation upon the license issued pursuant to the Private Detective Act of 1953 (“Act”), 22 P.S. § 11 et seq., as an added safeguard that" is not improper under the Act. Therefore, I would affirm the order of the trial court granting Mr. Clader a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In the Interest of R.H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Stanley AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. GreggSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. In re Kuma K-9 Security, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API