Legal Opinion

Dilks v. Carson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1946No. 32040PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, V. C. J.

Plaintiff, Maude Alma Dilks Carson, sued defendant, Oma Dilks, personally and as executrix of the last will and testament of Tom Dilks, deceased, to recover a one-half interest in testator’s estate. She alleged that she was the daughter of Tom Dilks; that he unintentionally omitted to make provision for her in his will; and that she was entitled to the same share of his estate that she would have taken had he died intestate. Upon trial, judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The record discloses that Tom Dilks and plaintiff’s mother, Lackey Manis, were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spaniard v. TantomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Courtney v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Riley v. CollierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. In Re Estate of MinearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Estate of LombardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of EversoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Estate of Crump v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Ferguson v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Bridgeford v. Estate of ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Estate of GlomsetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API