Goode & Co. v. Georgia Home Insusance
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Fauquier county, rendered April 13, 1892, in an action of assumpsit wherein the plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs, and the defendant in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
Upon the trial of this cause, which is an action of assump*393sit upon a fire insurance policy, the court excluded from the' jury certain evidence offered hy the plaintiffs in error. The court also gave judgment in favor of the defendant upon its demurrer to the evidence.
The action of the court, both in excluding evidence and in giving judgment in favor of the defendant, is assigned as error in this court.
The propriety of the rulings of the court in refusing to allow the rejected evidence to go to the jury depends upon the question whether the defendant company was affected by the knowledge of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Carpenter v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Arff v. Star Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Manhattan Fire Ins. v. Weill & UllmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
3Cited by20 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. HookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Springfield Fire Insurance v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Rommel v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. BollingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.