Legal Opinion
Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Bolling
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 5, 1940No. Record No. 2291PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
This is an action against a fire insurance company in which the plaintiff seeks indemnity for loss covered by its policy. She has a verdict and judgment, to which attach time-worn presumptions.
It is quite like that of Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Bolling, 173 Va. 228, 3 S. E. (2d) 182. There a judgment was also recovered, which we sustained. In the main, in each instance, the facts are the same and need not be restated. Each policy was written by the same agent. There were seven in all, among which insurance was distributed.
*187Henry Bolling, father-in-law of complainant, said:
“Q. Mr. Bolling, were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Insurance Co. v. StinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sheppard v. Peabody Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Morotock Insurance v. PankeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Minnieland Private Day School, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Erie Ins. Exchange v. EPC MD 15, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- Womble v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Aetna Insurance Company v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- JAM Inc. v. Nautilus Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.