Legal Opinion
Klanseck v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 26, 1981No. Civ. A. 80-72069PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THORNTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs herein seek a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. At issue is an employment policy of defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America alleged by plaintiffs to be violative of the Michigan Civil Rights Act. Plaintiffs are two persons each employed by defendant as a District Agent. Plaintiffs are planning to marry each other in August, 1980. It is the policy of the defendant that:
If two members of the District Agencies Sales Staff in the same or different Districts (Agents, Sales Managers, and Managers) marry, one of them must…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. SweeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Manhattan Pizza Hut, Inc. v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. C a Muer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Sharp v. Tulsa County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Miller v. C a Muer Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Townshend v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Lowry v. Sinai HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.