Legal Opinion
Miller v. C a Muer Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1983No. Docket 60299PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting summary judgment, GCR 1963, 117.2(1), in favor of defendant.
Plaintiff was employed as a waiter at one of defendant’s restaurants. Plaintiff announced his intention to marry a waitress that worked at the same restaurant. Plaintiff was informed by the restaurant manager that the defendant corporation’s "no-spoúse rule” forbade married couples from working in the same restaurant. Plaintiff was offered three alternatives: quit, be fired, or trans fer to another of defendant’s restaurants. Plaintiff quit and married his fiancée.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Manhattan Pizza Hut, Inc. v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Civil Rights Commission v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Kraft, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Thompson v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SCH. DIST., ETC.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Miller v. C a Muer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Greenbelt Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Lowry v. Sinai HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sears v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- DeBrabant v. Roadway Express, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.