Legal Opinion
People v. Ranger Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 2006No. B185427PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL, Acting P. J.
Penal Code section 1305, subdivision (a), provides, as relevant, that bail shall be forfeited “if, without sufficient excuse, a defendant fails to appear for . . . [a]ny ... HD ... [][]•• • occasion prior to the pronouncement of judgment if the defendant’s presence in court is lawfully required, [f] . . . [][] However, the court shall not have jurisdiction to declare a forfeiture and the bail shall be released of all obligations under the bond if the case is dismissed or if no complaint is filed within 15 days from the date of arraignment.” The question in this case…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. Stuyvesant InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. Classified Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. Topa InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
- County of Los Angeles v. Fairmont Specialty GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. American Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Co. of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & SuretyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.