B.K.W. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
B.K.W. and T.T.D. appeal disposition orders entered after they were adjudicated delinquent for armed burglary and grand theft. They contend that a separate disposition order is required for each offense, and that the challenged orders can be read to authorize supervision for more than the five-year statutory maximum authorized for grand theft committed by an adult. Agreeing with their first contention, we need not reach their second contention. We reverse and remand for entry of four separate disposition orders. See K.M.P. v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D420, 420, — So.2d-,-, 1999 WL 77746 (Fla.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- G.R.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- A. F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- A.L.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- E.Y. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- State v. ALWSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- S.I. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- SI v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- T.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001