S.I. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHCUTT, Acting Chief Judge.
S.I. contends the trial court should have discharged him from delinquency proceedings on speedy trial grounds. We disagree, and affirm on that point. However, we reverse and remand for the trial court to impose individual disposition and sentencing orders for the four charges, and to afford S.I. an opportunity to object to the imposition of a public defender’s lien.
On the speedy trial issue, the trial court correctly determined that S.I. was unavailable as defined in Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.090(d). Therefore, the recapture period set forth in Rule…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- S.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- J.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- B.K.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- A.M.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- AMP v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- SI v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001