Legal Opinion

S.I. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 2001No. 2D00-1169PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCUTT, Acting Chief Judge.

S.I. contends the trial court should have discharged him from delinquency proceedings on speedy trial grounds. We disagree, and affirm on that point. However, we reverse and remand for the trial court to impose individual disposition and sentencing orders for the four charges, and to afford S.I. an opportunity to object to the imposition of a public defender’s lien.

On the speedy trial issue, the trial court correctly determined that S.I. was unavailable as defined in Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.090(d). Therefore, the recapture period set forth in Rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. J.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. B.K.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A.M.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. AMP v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. SI v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API