Legal Opinion

A.L.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 16, 1997No. 97-808PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was charged in separate cases with petit theft and with dealing in stolen property and grand theft. He entered a plea of nolo contendere to all charges. The- Department of Juvenile Justice prepared a predisposition report recommending community control, but the trial court rejected this recommendation and imposed a moderate risk commitment without first obtaining a recommendation from the Department as to the restrictiveness level.

This court has consistently held that section 39.052(4)(e)2, Florida Statutes, requires a trial court to obtain a restrictiveness level recommendation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Interest of S.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. G.R.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. R.A.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. T.M.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. J.M.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. EDPSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. D.L.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. State v. ALWSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. T.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API