State v. . Marsh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DOUGLAS and WALKER. J J., dissenting. This case was before us at last term, S. v.Marsh, 132 N.C. 1000. There were numerous exceptions, none of which were considered because a motion in arrest of judgment was made and allowed for the absence from the indictment (for rape), as sent up in the record, of the words "against her will." This objection was not taken below. It now appears by the inspection of the indictment by the judge below, and his finding of fact thereon, that those words were in fact in the indictment as found by the grand jury and upon which the prisoner was tried, and were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
- State v. Marsh.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Cook v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Summerlin v. . CowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Council v. SmythSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- People v. DonovanMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.