Legal Opinion

State v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It appearing that the verdict was inadvertently recorded “guilty of murder in the third degree,” when in reality the jury returned a verdict of manslaughter, the motion of the State to remand the cause for correction of the record will be allowed. S. v. Harrison, 104 N. C., 728, 10 S. E., 131; S. v. Farrar, ibid., 702, 10 S. E., 159, S. c., 103 N. C., 411, 9 S. E., 449.

That the Superior Court at term has the power to make its records speak the truth, and, to this end, to correct them, if need be, is established hy a number of decisions. S. v. Marsh, 134 N. C., 184, 47 S. E., 6; S. v. Currie,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. City of Durham v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. State v. . BordeauxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  4. State v. . SwepsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Summerlin v. . CowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Ragan v. . RaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. N. C. Joint Stock Land Bank v. CherrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API