Legal Opinion

Veer v. Tyrrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

This is an appeal from that portion of an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County, granting the motions of defendants Thomas I. Tyrrell (Tyrrell), Willig & Brown, Inc. (Willig & Brown), Robert K. Mix (Mix) and Victor Comptometer Corp. (Victor) to dismiss the appellant’s cross claims contained in its amended answer on the ground that they fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action over against them.

On October 3, 1964 Tyrrell rented an .electric golf cart from Mix, the golf professional for the appellant, for use on the club course. The cart involved had been manufactured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Hoisting Engine Sales Co. v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Matter of Casualty Co. (Bliss Co. Claim)New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Johnson v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Moriarty v. PorterCity of New York Municipal Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Industralease Automated & Scientific Equipment Corp. v. R. M. E. Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Assam v. Deer Park Spring Water, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  4. Communications Groups, Inc. v. Warner Communications Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988
  5. Laudisio v. Amoco Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API