Quechee Lakes Rental Corp. v. Boggess
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentDooley, J.
If the trial court had accepted the theory adopted by the majority, I would be tempted to affirm and join the majority opinion. The trial court did not accept this theory for good reasons, and the majority opinion is not consistent with the standard for reviewing the trial court’s findings and decision. As a result of the majority’s decision, the sellers, whose manipulations were the sole cause of their losing a sale on terms they set, escape the legal consequences of their actions. I dissent.
The majority characterizes the trial court decision as concluding that the brokers breached their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pond v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
- Moore & Co. v. T-A-L-L, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Musselman v. Southwinds Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Wallace v. OdhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Arjay Properties, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983