Pond v. Carter
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
The plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action in Rutland County Court to recover his commission under an exclusive listing agreement. Trial was by jury. Following a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed. He asserts error by the trial court on several grounds.
The defendant moved for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and again at the close of all of the evidence. The court overruled these motions which defendant claims was reversible error. The defendant has briefed two arguments in support of his contention that a directed verdict…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. SchartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Tseung Chu v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Knowles v. HendersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Northern Aircraft, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. MinerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- State v. SavoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.