Legal Opinion
Haydel v. Morton
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 8, 1938No. Civ. 10041PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAXEY, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff herein secured a judgment against the defendant, predicated upon a charge of malicious prosecution. The case was tried before a jury and interrogatories were propounded and findings thereon duly made by the jury. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the verdict. The defendant appealed, and on March 24, 1937, this court reversed the judgment; the respondent petitioned for a hearing by the Supreme Court after judgment in the District Court of Appeal. This petition was denied by the Supreme Court on May 20, 1937. Thereafter a remittitur was issued out of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rowland v. KreyenhagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Municipal Bond Co. v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Ellenberger v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.