Legal Opinion

People v. Stone

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1949No. Crim. No. 2094PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant, II. V. Stone, appearing in proper person, moved this court to recall and quash a remittitur after the judgment of conviction of conspiracy to commit abortions had been affirmed on appeal.

It is contended the remittitur should be recalled because the judgment is invalid on account of the admission in evidence of medical instruments and Dorex soap solution “without complete knowledge of all the circumstances, and causing a mistake as to the facts of the ease.” It is also asserted that the opinion which was rendered by this court on appeal is likewise erroneous for the same…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Municipal Bond Co. v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Edelman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State v. ProudIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State v. CraigWashington Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API