Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Petsas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1979No. 78-1090PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, Senior District Judge:

Appellant, Peter Petsas, was convicted by a jury of fifteen counts of causing false information to be submitted to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1010. He was sentenced to eighteen months in prison and a $5,000 fine on Count One. He received concurrent eighteen month sentences for each of the fourteen other counts.

Petsas was in the business of buying houses, usually from the HUD, repairing and then selling them. Occasionally, he repaired and sold houses for others including the Chairman of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WallsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Jack Andrew BryanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Terry Joseph WingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Brian BingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Greg Lynn MakleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael A. LipscombCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Ronald E. VeatchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. VeatchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Michael A. LipscombCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API