United States v. Michael A. Lipscomb
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Michael Lipscomb of possession of heroin with intent to distribute, and he now appeals. Lipscomb did not testify in his own defense; had he done so, the government would have impeached his credibility with an eight-year-old robbery conviction under Rule 609(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Three other defense witnesses did testify and were impeached by prior felony convictions. In ruling that these prior convictions satisfied Rule 609(a)(l)’s requirement that “the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Otha Lee MahoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- State v. KoloskeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BannerUtah Supreme Court · 1986
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.