Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

This appeal presents three issues:

1. Was the special verdict rendered invalid because of the dissents of three jurors on the questions of causal negligence, comparative negligence, and damages?

2. Did the trial court err in refusing to strike certain testimony of Mrs. Kroha relating to pecuniary loss, and, if not, was the pecuniary loss award excessive?

3. Was the deceased causally negligent?

Was the Special Verdict Defective?

We find no precedent governing the precise factual situation in this case.

Defendant urges that the verdict is fatally defective and that the case should therefore be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BurchardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Scipior v. SheaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Swanson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Mertens v. LundquistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Wing v. DeppeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bitter v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  2. Crotty v. BrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lorbecki v. KingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API