LaBombard v. Samaritan Health System
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal arises from an interpleader action filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) to determine who is entitled to receive $20,-674.78 in interpleaded funds. We hold that Tammy LaBombard has failed to show detrimental reliance and therefore Samaritan Health System (Samaritan) is not estopped to assert its medical lien. Because Samaritan holds a medical lien it is entitled to collect all of its “customary charges” from the proceeds of Tammy LaBombard’s settlement with State Farm’s insured. However, Samaritan must pay a proportionate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re Guardianship of BloomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Blankenbaker v. JonovichArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Banner Health v. Medical Savings InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.