Legal Opinion

LaBombard v. Samaritan Health System

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 6, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0473PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal arises from an interpleader action filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) to determine who is entitled to receive $20,-674.78 in interpleaded funds. We hold that Tammy LaBombard has failed to show detrimental reliance and therefore Samaritan Health System (Samaritan) is not estopped to assert its medical lien. Because Samaritan holds a medical lien it is entitled to collect all of its “customary charges” from the proceeds of Tammy LaBombard’s settlement with State Farm’s insured. However, Samaritan must pay a proportionate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re Guardianship of BloomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Blankenbaker v. JonovichArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Banner Health v. Medical Savings InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API