Hanten v. Palace Builders, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Connie Hanten appeals the circuit court’s order reversing a Department of Labor decision that her tendonitis condition is work-related and therefore compensable. We affirm.
FACTS & PROCEDURE
[¶2.] Connie Hanten (Hanten) was employed by Palace Builders, Inc. (Palace) in 1979 as a clerical worker, which, beginning in 1982, involved the use of computers. In 1989, Hanten began developing pain, numbness, and a tingling sensation in her right hand and arm. She reported her injury to Palace and began treatment with a chiropractor.
[¶ 3.] Hanten’s symptoms grew worse. In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Helms v. Lynn's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stene v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. Albertson'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Kester v. Colonial Manor of CusterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.