Legal Opinion
Curry v. Griffith
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 26, 1974No. Civ. 320PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from the granting of a new trial upon motion of plaintiff. In its order granting the new trial the court stated. . . the court is of opinion the damages awarded the plaintiff are inadequate to the extent a new trial should be granted.”
We said in Smith v. Winkles, 49 Ala.App. 454, 273 So.2d 215, as follows:
“It appears thus that the question presented to the trial court on a motion for new trial based solely upon the ground of inadequate or excessive damages awarded by the jury, in the absence of an affirmative showing in the record of the presence of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- McLemore v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- King v. SturgisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cannon v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Watkins v. BurksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Wells v. MohammadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Wells v. MohammadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003