Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Burks

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1983No. Civ. 3647Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Judge.

The plaintiff sued the defendant as a result of an automobile accident. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and assessed her damages at $3,950. Thereafter, the plaintiff filed a motion for new trial. The plaintiff’s motion was granted and defendant appeals.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the basis of inadequate damages.

We do not deem it necessary to set out in detail the facts surrounding this appeal. Suffice it to say that there is competent evidence that the plaintiff incurred…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Yarbrough v. MallorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. McLemore v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. King v. SturgisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API