Legal Opinion

McLemore v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 2, 1956No. 8 Div. 814PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Plaintiff McLemore sued the defendant Unions and one Michael Yolk, alleging that they prevented him from working at his job at the copper plant in Decatur, by means of unlawful picketing and committing an assault and battery on him. The jury awarded a verdict of $8,000. Defendants filed a motion for a new trial which was granted, and it is from that ruling that this appeal is taken.

In the language of the trial judge, “the pivotal question raised by the motion for a new trial is whether the arguments of one of plaintiff’s attorneys complained of, constituted such prejudicial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Roan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Beecher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Christian v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Nix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Cooper v. Bishop Freeman Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API