Legal Opinion

United States v. Danielczyk

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 26, 2011No. 1:11cr85 (JCC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.

This case involves an alleged scheme of recruiting donors and reimbursing their contributions to Hillary Clinton’s 2006 and 2008 Senate and Presidential Campaigns. Defendants’ motions to dismiss raise significant questions of statutory construction, mens rea, and Congress’s ability to ban direct corporate contributions in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010). For the following reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ motions.

I. Background

O…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ognibene v. ParkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. Iowa Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. TookerDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011
  4. United States v. WhittemoreDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  5. United States v. KukushkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API