Legal Opinion

State v. Newton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 16, 2018No. SC 20012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKahn, J.

**346*274This appeal requires us to determine the appropriate mens rea for the crime of illegal practices in campaign financing. The defendant, Ernest Newton II, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of three counts of illegal practices in campaign financing in violation of General Statutes §§ 9-622 (7) and 53a-8. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly failed to instruct the jury that, in order to find him guilty of an illegal campaign financing practice in violation of § 9-622 (7), it must find that he acted **347with specific intent to violate that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PurcellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. Boccanfuso v. DaghoghiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. State v. MoranConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
  5. State v. PurcellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API