Legal Opinion
United States v. Whittemore
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 10, 2013No. 3:12-CR-00058-LRHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant F. Harvey Whittemore’s Motion in Limine Regarding (1) the Admissibility of Evidence of Whittemore’s Reasonable Interpretation of 2 U.S.C. § 441f; and (2) the Admissibility of Testimony of 'Whittemore’s Expert Witness (# 791). The government has responded (# 111), and "Whittemore has replied (# 130).
I. Facts and Background
In 2007, defendant Whittemore allegedly promised to raise $150,000 in campaign contributions for a candidate’s re-election campaign for the United States Senate. To make good on his promise, Whittemore…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Golia-Huffman v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Ice Castles, LLC v. LaBelle Lake Ice Palace, LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- United States v. MichelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023