Wright v. Moore
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice:
In this appeal, we again consider the admissibility of settlement evidence. Appellant was involved in two motor vehicle accidents, a few months apart, and sued the drivers of both vehicles in a single complaint. One driver settled before trial. The trial court allowed the other driver to argue to the jury that the settlement fully compensated appellant for all of her injuries. This Court has explained that, if necessary to avoid confusion, a jury may be told that one party to a lawsuit has settled. Here, however, there was no risk of jury confusion, and appellee used the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Joseph Ex Rel. Joseph v. MonroeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Alexander v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- State v. FarishNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
- Atwell Ex Rel. Atwell v. RHIS, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Wright v. MooreSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- John Klein v. Jill SussmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.