Wright v. Moore
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant, Debra Wright, petitioned for an interlocutory appeal contesting a Superior Court judge’s refusal to reopen discovery following remand for a new trial. In Wright’s first trial in this personal injury action, the jury returned a verdict for defendants-appellees, Michael Moore and Simco Sales Service of Pennsylvania, Inc. On appeal, we reversed and remanded for a new trial to correct errors that occurred in the first trial. The trial judge entered a scheduling order on remand and Wright moved to modify that order in order to present evidence of new…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Chavin v. CopeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Sammons v. Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Coleman v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cuonzo v. ShoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Anderson v. NITIN ENTERPRISES, INC.Superior Court of Delaware · 2010
- Hernandez-Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
- State of Delaware v. Wright.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015