Legal Opinion

Wright v. Moore

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 17, 2008No. 612, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, Debra Wright, petitioned for an interlocutory appeal contesting a Superior Court judge’s refusal to reopen discovery following remand for a new trial. In Wright’s first trial in this personal injury action, the jury returned a verdict for defendants-appellees, Michael Moore and Simco Sales Service of Pennsylvania, Inc. On appeal, we reversed and remanded for a new trial to correct errors that occurred in the first trial. The trial judge entered a scheduling order on remand and Wright moved to modify that order in order to present evidence of new…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Chavin v. CopeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Sammons v. Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Coleman v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cuonzo v. ShoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Anderson v. NITIN ENTERPRISES, INC.Superior Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. Hernandez-Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
  4. State of Delaware v. Wright.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API