Legal Opinion

State v. Mendieta

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1995No. 04-94-00512-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONE, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order quashing the indictment on a charge of criminal trespass. The motion to quash asserted that the indictment afforded Defendant insufficient notice because it neither alleged the identity of the owner of the property, nor described the location of the property. We agree that the indictment failed to provide defendant with sufficient notice of the offense, and therefore affirm the trial court’s order.

Article I, section 10 of the Texas Constitution “guarantees an accused the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Drumm v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bobby Joe Parr v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2008
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API