Legal Opinion
Young v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 16, 1993No. 05-89-00571-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
BAKER, Justice.
On original submission, we held the evidence sufficient to support the verdict and that the trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s Batson2 motion. See Young v. State, No. 05-89-00571-CR (Tex.App.—Dallas, March 5, 1990) (not designated for publication), rev’d, 826 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). We stated:
In his brief, appellant brings forth testimony from the voir dire which he asserts casts doubt on the prosecutor’s explanations. Appellant urges that we compare the individuals that the State struck with those who were not struck and to use these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Tompkins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dennis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
- Magee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Whitaker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.