People v. Faulkner
California Court of Appeal
1DissentKingsley, J.
—I dissent. As I view the record in this case, it shows that, prior to the warning of constitutional rights given to defendant by Officer Harper after the latter had taken defendant into his custody and placed him in the police car, there had been discussions between defendant and police officers concerning the O’Neal shooting and defendant’s part therein.
*63I agree with the majority opinion that we must regard the prosecutor’s opening statement as having been made in good faith. But, if we do so, we are faced with a record which shows, affirmatively, that the police had suspected defendant on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. StockmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966