Legal Opinion

People v. McGee

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1965No. Crim. 10359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmus, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of a violation of section 487, subd. 3 of the Penal Code—grand theft, automobile. Reversal is sought on the basis that the admission of certain statements by defendant violated the rule of Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 [84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977], as applied in People v. Dorado, 62 Cal.2d 338 [42 Cal.Rptr. 169, 398 P.2d 361].

Apart from the statements mentioned, the prosecution’s case was rather meager: on January 22, 1964, one Prank J. White was the owner of a 1961 Corvair Monza, California license JUT 063, serial number 109270-132927. At 10:30 p.m. that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. People v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. FaulknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. FaulknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API