Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Preston

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2000No. 98-SC-0558-DGPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

In Georgia litigation between the estate of a Kentucky resident and an uninsured resident of Illinois, the jury apportioned fault 60% against the Kentucky decedent and 40% against the uninsured Illinois driver. Under the modified comparative fault scheme in Georgia, a finding of fault of 50% or more against a plaintiff precludes recovery. The issue in this declaratory judgment action between the estate of the decedent and its uninsured motorist insurance carrier is whether the outcome of the Georgia litigation precludes recovery under the uninsured motorist policy.

On…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Coots v. Allstate Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Sahloff v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Simon v. Continental Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. HatfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jenkins v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. RyanKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SlusherKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API