Legal Opinion

North Dakota State University v. United States

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided November 19, 1999No. A3-98-50PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WEBB, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the court is defendant United States’ motion for summary judgment, (doc. # 22). Plaintiff North Dakota State University (NDSU) opposes the motion, (doc. #26), and advocates instead that summary judgment be granted in favor of itself since there are no material issues of fact to be tried. Although NDSU has not formally filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, the United States has not and does not object to the Court treating this as such. The parties have agreed that this matter should be decided in a summary fáshion, and the court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Univ Pgh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. University of Pittsburgh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. University of Pittsburgh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API