Legal Opinion
Cahill v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1986No. CA-9592PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerns, J.
On November 21, 1984, Charles Hamilton filed an application with the Board of Zoning Appeals for the city of Dayton seeking a conditional use permit and related zoning variances in order to effect an expansion of a nursing facility known as Grandview Manor. After a hearing upon objections of property owners in the immediate area of the facility, the board of zoning appeals granted the application of Hamilton, but on April 24, 1985, two property owners in the neighborhood, James Cahill and Martha Homer, appealed the decision of the board of zoning appeals to the Court of Common Pleas of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Village of GlendaleOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- SMC, Inc. v. LaudiOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Talbut v. City of PerrysburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re Annexation of Certain Territory to PauldingOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rife v. Franklin County Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Savon Ents. v. Boardman Twp. TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- City of Cleveland v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 1988