Newman v. Subsequent Injury Fund
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Judge,
Specially Assigned.
Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.VoI.) Art. 101 (Workmen’s Compensation), § 33(c) provides inter alia:
Whenever by statute, charter, ordinances, resolution, regulation or policy adopted thereunder, whether as part of a pension system or otherwise, any benefit or benefits are furnished employees of employers covered under § 21(a)(2) of this article[ 1 ] ..., the benefit or benefits when furnished by the employer shall satisfy and discharge pro tanto or in full as the case may be, the liability or obligation of the employer and the Subsequent Injury…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Nooe v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Polomski v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Blevins v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Fikar v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- State Retirement & Pension System v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Chesapeake Supply & Equipment Co. v. J.I. Case Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.