Legal Opinion

Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand Oaks

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2002No. S091069PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case we determine whether the abandonment theory of liability applies against a public agency, and whether plaintiff public works contractor, which sued for breach or abandonment of the public works contract, is entitled to compensation under a total cost method of measuring damages. The jury found the contract was breached and abandoned, and awarded total cost damages. The Court of Appeal affirmed. We conclude the *232theory of abandonment does not apply against a public entity, and that Amelco Electric failed to adduce sufficient evidence to warrant instructing the jury…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
  2. City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Marshall v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API