Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand Oaks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
In this case we determine whether the abandonment theory of liability applies against a public agency, and whether plaintiff public works contractor, which sued for breach or abandonment of the public works contract, is entitled to compensation under a total cost method of measuring damages. The jury found the contract was breached and abandoned, and awarded total cost damages. The Court of Appeal affirmed. We conclude the *232theory of abandonment does not apply against a public entity, and that Amelco Electric failed to adduce sufficient evidence to warrant instructing the jury…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Reflectone, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- City of Hope National Medical Center v. Genentech, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Marshall v. Pasadena Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.