Legal Opinion
Struble v. New Jersey Brewery Employees' Welfare Trust Fund
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 16, 1984No. Nos. 83-5115, and 83-5220 to 83-5224PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the portion of the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants on two of the four counts in the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. The district court certified that portion of the order as final under Rule 54(b), and we therefore have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Defendants cross-appeal the remaining portion of the district court’s order denying their summary judgment motions on the remaining two counts and certifying four “controlling questions of law” under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). We permitted an…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Malone v. White Motor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.