Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Shaw v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 21, 1930No. Docket Nos. 26804, 26868Published

The liability for taxes asserted against the petitioners as transferees is barred by the statute of limitations.

1Concurrence

Murdock,

concurring: I agree with the decision of this case but desire to set forth my reason for so doing.

The Revenue Act of 1926 was not intended to and did not authorize the assessment or collection of any tax which at the time of its enactment could not be assessed or collected because of the bar of the statutory period of limitation properly applicable thereto. See section 278 (e). Section 278 (d) of that act provides that a tax may be collected within six years after a timely assessment. Section 280 (b) provides a period of limitation for assessment of transferee liability, but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. United States v. UpdikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Illingworth v. SpauldingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API